India
must listen to Tamil aspirations for the creation of Tamil Nadu as a separate
country.
By
Dhammika Dharmawardhane
For
as long as 6000 years and counting, Tamil Nadu existed in the southernmost part
of the Indian Peninsula. Tamil Nadu, for the convenience of English speakers
means just that – Tamil Land. This land is home to Tamils, also known as
Dravidians . The Dravidian Civilization encapsulated the state of Tamil Nadu as
well some of its neighbouring states of Kerala, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh.
A
part of the 28 states of India, Tamil Nadu is the eleventh largest state in
India by area and the seventh most populous state. It is the fourth largest
contributor (as of 2010) to India's GDP and ranks tenth in the Human
Development Index as of 2006. Tamil Nadu is also the most urbanised state in
India. The state has the highest number (10.56%) of business enterprises and
stands second in total employment (9.97%) in India, compared to the population
share of about 6%. Tamil Nadu’s southern coast borders troublesome neighbours
Sri Lanka. All these factors therefore contribute to the important role Tamil
Nadu plays in India. Therefore the history of the struggle itself within, for
Tamils fighting for their independence from India.
History
teaches us to not borrow from but learn from it. The aspirations of the
Dravidians for a Tamil Land, again, however are worth mention for all of the
above and more. For as in most journeys, it is not the beginning or the end.
It’s the journey itself that counts the most.
The
DMK (Dravida
Munnetra Kazhagam) in Tamil Nadu, the
Akali Dal in Punjab and the Mizos and Nagas in North East India and more
recently the supporters of Khalistan movements have been demanding secession
from India. Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (Dravidian Progress
Federation) founded in 1949, is a state political party in the states of Tamil
Nadu and Pondicherry, India.
For
as far as 1950 there were separatists or secessionists wanting an
"Independent Tamil Nadu" or "Free Tamil Nadu". Then the
India congress pushed to redraw Indian boundries along ethnic and linguistic
lines. Jawahar Nehru the then Prime Minister of India resisted this, fearing
that if all Tamils were pushed into one province, then the call for separatism
would grow stronger. There was
just cause to fear Tamil succession in the 1950s’ and 1960’. Tamil leaders
demanded from India’s central government complete autonomy or the least
secession. Despite Nehru’s concerns the India congress in 1956 voted to draw
provincial boundaries along linguistic lines. This was a big victory for Tamils
as they now had heir own pseudo-state called Tamil Nadu.
Then
1960, the DMK organised a joint campaign throughout Madras state demanding its
secession from India and for making it an independent sovereign state Tamil
Nadu.
In
1961, another organisation by the name of Tamil Arasu Kazhagam lunched an
agitation for the renaming of Madras state as Tamil Nadu. DMK even proposed
that the states of Madras, Andhra Pradesh. Kerala and Mysore should secede from
the Indian Union and form an independent republic of Dravida Nadu.
In
1963, the Indian parliament adopted the constitution bill that enables to make
laws providing penalties for any person questioning the sovereignty and
integrity of the Indian Union. As a result, DMK dropped from its programme the
demand for a sovereign independent Dravidian federation and its secession from
the Indian Union. However the very DNA of the DMK remains in the struggle for a
separate Tamil Homeland – a Tamil Nadu. The on going Tamil Nadu debate
continues fiercely in India with the occasional incident of communal violence.
India
has begun to feel the pressure internationally since recently. Mainly due to
the fall of the Soviet Union, the reunification of Germany and the Arab Spring.
All of course best examples of realising the will of the people.
The
voice and financial support of the Tamil Diaspora in Canada, Australia, Europe
and the USA added to this violent campaign for freedom from India.
These
aspirations for a Tamil Land soon spilled over from the Southern most shores of
Tamil Nadu to the northern shores of India’s southern neighbour, the island of
Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka is well known for its’ vibrant Tamil people and culture.
Bringing with them from Tamil Nadu, the Tamil people migrated to Sri Lanka over
centuries. Some by choice, and the few brought over to Sri Lanka during
colonial times by the British Raj in the 1800’s to work in the tea plantations.
This very existence of Dravidian history in Sri Lanka has ensured over the years
close ties to Tamil Nadu and India. Temples for the Goddess Kali and God
Murugan are all over Sri Lanka, powerful reminders to anyone of the most
revered of Tamil Gods.
No
history of a Tamil Land of course is not complete without the 30-year terrorist
war suffered by Sri Lanka since the setting up of the LTTE in northern Sri
Lanka. The Liberation Tamil Tigers for Eelam was set up by it’s charismatic but
now dead leader Vellupillai Prabhakaran in 1976 in the Jaffna peninsula of Sri
Lanka. The LTTE grew from strength to strength from 1983, with Sri Lanka’s
biggest shame taking place in July that year. The civilian riots that lead to
the loss of many Tamil lives, property and mass migration of Tamils from Sri
Lanka to Australia, Europe, UK, Canada and USA. Strong support from Tamil Nadu and India, and now a powerful
Tamil Diaspora enjoying western democracy, all contributed growth of the LTTE
who chose violence as means to their struggle of a Tamil Eelam in Sri Lanka.
Theirs,
the LTTE’s, most dubious claim to worldwide fame being the inventors of the
human suicide bomb. Deadly bomb rigged jackets worn by terrorists who had no
qualm of blowing themselves up with their intended target and everyone else in
the vicinity.
India
had to stand by Tamil Nadu and intervene in Sri Lanka. DMK popularity and the
importance of Tamil Nadu in their political mix demanded Indian Government
equine cense. All what was required for Eelam to work, was building a
underwater highway linking Sri Lanka to Tamil Nadu and natural progression of
agitation for a separate Tamil Nadu. Now vice a versa, first originating from
India to succeed in Sri Lanka, and back with added voice and reason to India.
Tamil
Nadu. Truly a Tamil Land, the Dravidian Country. Alike India, the Hindu
Country.
The author believes that the beginning to the end of terrorism
in Sri Lanka started from 1987.
In May 1987 the Sri Lankan army began a major ground and air
campaign against Tamil rebels concentrated in the Jaffna Peninsula in the north
of the country. The Indian government, which faced growing discontent among its
own southern Tamil population, began to pressure Colombo to cease its
offensive. On the following day an Indian task force steamed off the horizon of
Colombo, sending a clear signal to the Sri Lankan government.
On 29 July 1987 India and Sri Lanka signed an accord whereby an
Indian Peace-keeping Force (IPKF) would be sent to Sri Lanka to engineer the
disarming of Tamil guerrillas in the northern province of the country and
oversee a ceasefire. On the same day, the commandos in the Indian task force
were landed at Colombo harbour in order to provide security during the signing
of the accord. In July the initial elements of the division began landing at
the Jaffna airfield in northern Sri Lanka.
By early October 1987, relations had become strained between the
IPKF and the Tamil Tiger guerrillas. Fighting became all but inevitable after
five commandos were kidnapped by the Tamils and brutally murdered. In order to
cripple the Tamil guerrilla network, the Indian Army planned to capture the
insurgent headquarters in Jaffna City. Codenamed Operation `Pawan', the Indian
plan involved an initial heli-borne assault into the centre of the city
followed by a multi-prong ground advance from all directions.
The initial heli-borne assault began on 11 October, the commandos
flew in low over Jaffna City. Unaware that their radio communications were
being monitored by the Tamil Tigers, the commandos landed in a soccer field and
were immediately pinned down by heavy machine gun fire. Two helicopters were
damaged and six commandos killed instantly. A second wave of choppers
containing a platoon from Sikh
Light Infantry came under more intense fire, making further reinforcements
impossible.
All but one of the Sikhs perished.
Cornered and running out of ammunition, the commandos pleaded for
reinforcements. Their battalion commander personally led a column of T-72 tanks
the next morning to relieve his beleaguered men.
After the failure of the commando assault, the infantry brigades
slowly fought their way into Jaffna City over the next 16 days. Because of
heavy Tamil Tiger resistance, two more brigades were rushed to Jaffna before
the end of the battle. The entire operation was marked by major confusion on
the part of the IPKF. As a result, the IPKF were unable to maximize the use of
this battalion.
By the end of November, Jaffna was completely in IPKF hands. Most
of the Tamil Tiger guerrillas,
however, had slipped out of the Indian net and infiltrated to the east. With
their duties fast becoming a protracted affair, the IPKF shifted to handle
counter-insurgency operations in the Eastern Province. The Northern Province,
meanwhile, remained as part of operations.
In March 1989 the IPKF launched Operation Falcon, a clearing drive
in the east involving mountain troops and paratroopers. Two months later the
IPKF withdrew 8,000 of its 50,000 men to India. Over the next few months, the
IPKF was considerably reduced in size. On 31 March 1990, the final 2,000 men of
the IPKF were sent home. In 30 months the Indians had lost 1,115 dead in Sri
Lanka.
Worse, they failed to achieve peace in this troubled island
nation.
Then Rajiv Gandhi, the 46-year-old
Indian prime minister, was assassinated by the LTTE in 1991.He was campaigning
for the Congress Party on the second day of voting in the world's largest
democratic election when a powerful bomb, hidden in a basket of flowers,
exploded killing him instantly. At least 14 other people were also killed in
the attack in the town of Sriperumbudur, about 30 miles from Madras, the
capital of the southern state of Tamil Nadu.
Mr. Gandhi's arch-enemies, the
Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), the violent guerrilla group fighting
for a separate homeland for Tamils on the island of Sri Lanka were proved
responsible. Many say that Rajiv Gandhi the grandson of Jawahar Nehru was
assassinated by the Tamil the LTTE in revenge for sending Indian peace keeping
forces to North Sri Lanka. But the Tamil history of conflict for a
separate country and the anti-Nehru sentiments have existed from the 1950s’ as
Rajiv’s mother Indira Gandhi another former PM of India herself was the
daughter of Nehru.
The death of Rajiv Gandhi at least
temporarily saw India cease to be as interested in its neighbour Sri Lanka, but
not the actions of the Tamils within their motherland. The LTTE increasingly
found it difficult to operate out of the coasts of Tamil Nadu and operate
terrorist camps out of India. But success for a separate Tamil country in India
no longer carried that true.
When the end came for the
Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, in May, 2009, it was overwhelming and
unmerciful. In a three-year offensive of increasing sophistication, the Sri
Lankan Army outmaneuvered one of the world’s most ruthless insurgent armies.
The battlefield defeat ended a vicious conflict that for 30 years that divided
Sri Lanka along ethnic lines.
The Tigers were persistent suicide
bombers, as well as relentless guerrilla fighters, and the war took at least a
hundred thousand lives in Sri Lanka.
To the extent that a
counter-insurgency campaign can be successful, Sri Lanka is a grisly test case
for success in modern warfare. The Tigers’ collapse began in January, 2009,
when they lost the town of Kilinochchi, their de-facto capital. By May, their
remaining fighters retreated into the jungle near the coastal town of
Mullaittivu, taking along more than three hundred thousand Tamil civilians who
were trapped with them.
Hemmed in by the sea, a lagoon,
and a hundred thousand government soldiers, the Tigers were all but helpless.
On May 16th, 2009, Sri Lankas’
Army commander, General Sarath Fonseka, declared victory. Two days later, the
Army announced that the Tiger leader, Velupillai Prabhakaran, had been killed.
After the carnage, President
Mahinda Rajapaksa’s government adopted a posture of triumph at home and
resentment of the outrage it caused abroad. The important thing, Sri Lanka’s
High Commissioner in London said, was that Sri Lanka had ended terrorism,
making it the first country in the modern age to have done so.
Although until the very end,
Velupillai Prabhakaran believed that the international relief community, the
U.N., and Western governments would save the Tamil Tigers. The L.T.T.E.
continued to read the world as if it was pre-9/11.
Many of the Tamils the author
encounters now feel that the peace is perilously fragile. It should not be
forgotten that the more successful counter-insurgencies, like Sri Lanka’s, are
ugly in practice.
But the Tamils continue their struggle for a Tamil Nadu, a Tamil
Land they already have but desire to be as their own country.
India, as a country, by any name, never existed before the
British colonial rule in all history, in spite of the often-repeated false
propaganda of the long history, oneness and unity of India.
Once again, now in 2012, we see the DMK re-introducing the agenda
for a separate Tamil Land, Tamil Nadu to be its own country, away from Mother
India. Of Independence. Borrowing from the great Dr. Martin Luther King, the
bells for Tamil independence ring from near and far, from Canada to Australia,
USA to Europe, UK to India, and all over the world.
So does the clarion call to end terrorism, from everywhere
in the world.
Dhammika Dharmawardhane is a Sri Lankan now domiciled in the
United Kingdom. He is a marketing communications professional with over two
decades experience in the marketing and advertising industry. He now works as
an Information Architecture Consultant providing digital marketing and
traditional marketing communication services to Sri Lanka, USA and UK, with
consultancies in Colombo, London and Washington D.C.
1 comment:
Great read.
India is a nation dominated by the Hindi-wallahs. Therefore, it mustn't simply listen to Tamil aspirations. It must listen to the aspirations of all the non-Hindi populations - Malayalees, Kannadigas, Telegus, Marathis, Assamese, Bengali, Punjabi, etc. All for the greater good of the people in the subcontinent.
Dravid
dravidian (at) mail (dot) com
Post a Comment